User login

Reply to comment

Canonical as a standard

"You mean canonical implementation is good, as in "crap, in order to be fully Python-compliant, we must correctly emulate all CPython's quirks" (see PyPy)"

Well... Yes. There are many quirky standards around, but having a quirky one is better than having none as it fragments the target you write your programs to. Also, if CPython is too quirky, one can always propose something like Python 3 (that removes several quirks).

Reply

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.