Comments on: LispCast Episode 3 http://www.lispcast.com/wordpress/2007/10/lispcast-episode-3/ Tue, 18 Nov 2008 15:28:41 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.1 By: Oliver Charles http://www.lispcast.com/wordpress/2007/10/lispcast-episode-3/#comment-779 Oliver Charles Tue, 12 Feb 2008 00:58:29 +0000 http://www.lispcast.com/wordpress/2007/10/lispcast-episode-3/#comment-779 This is my favourite video of the 3 I've seen so far :) I found myself impressed with how fluid lisp makes refactoring. I think this is going to be my "home" language for a while, and I need to pimp my emacs/stop being lazy and get as efficient as you at editing lisp. Keep up the good work, will move onto episode 4 soon :) This is my favourite video of the 3 I’ve seen so far :) I found myself impressed with how fluid lisp makes refactoring. I think this is going to be my “home” language for a while, and I need to pimp my emacs/stop being lazy and get as efficient as you at editing lisp.

Keep up the good work, will move onto episode 4 soon :)

]]> By: Victor http://www.lispcast.com/wordpress/2007/10/lispcast-episode-3/#comment-682 Victor Sun, 06 Jan 2008 04:45:33 +0000 http://www.lispcast.com/wordpress/2007/10/lispcast-episode-3/#comment-682 Well, that's cool! Still - incpoints/decpoints could be refactored into single one. Well, that’s cool! Still - incpoints/decpoints could be refactored into single one.

]]> By: LispCast Episode 4 | LispCast http://www.lispcast.com/wordpress/2007/10/lispcast-episode-3/#comment-477 LispCast Episode 4 | LispCast Sun, 11 Nov 2007 01:04:51 +0000 http://www.lispcast.com/wordpress/2007/10/lispcast-episode-3/#comment-477 [...] Only a few functions need to be changed since we refactored it in the last episode. [...] […] Only a few functions need to be changed since we refactored it in the last episode. […]

]]> By: D. Sears http://www.lispcast.com/wordpress/2007/10/lispcast-episode-3/#comment-476 D. Sears Tue, 30 Oct 2007 11:23:57 +0000 http://www.lispcast.com/wordpress/2007/10/lispcast-episode-3/#comment-476 These are really great!!! I look forward to episode 4! These are really great!!! I look forward to episode 4!

]]> By: Joost Diepenmaat http://www.lispcast.com/wordpress/2007/10/lispcast-episode-3/#comment-475 Joost Diepenmaat Tue, 30 Oct 2007 08:34:22 +0000 http://www.lispcast.com/wordpress/2007/10/lispcast-episode-3/#comment-475 Ah right. Thanks. Looks like for some reason debian's slime package isn't/can't be configured to have slime-complete-symbol work like that on my system. I installed the CVS version of slime and that seems to work better. Ah right. Thanks. Looks like for some reason debian’s slime package isn’t/can’t be configured to have slime-complete-symbol work like that on my system. I installed the CVS version of slime and that seems to work better.

]]> By: admin http://www.lispcast.com/wordpress/2007/10/lispcast-episode-3/#comment-474 admin Tue, 30 Oct 2007 04:34:06 +0000 http://www.lispcast.com/wordpress/2007/10/lispcast-episode-3/#comment-474 That's just slime smart auto-completion. I think it's enabled by default in slime-mode. That’s just slime smart auto-completion. I think it’s enabled by default in slime-mode.

]]> By: Joost Diepenmaat http://www.lispcast.com/wordpress/2007/10/lispcast-episode-3/#comment-473 Joost Diepenmaat Tue, 30 Oct 2007 00:18:45 +0000 http://www.lispcast.com/wordpress/2007/10/lispcast-episode-3/#comment-473 Nice. I'm quite new to lisp, and these videos are a great way to see what's possible. I've always hated the "*-unit" style of defining tests, though :-) It just seems too verbose without giving a "natural language" feel to the code. RSpec (the Ruby extension) looks much nicer and should be easy to port to lisp (if it hasn't already) - http://rspec.rubyforge.org/ Anyway, I also have a question: what emacs command/library do you use to do that funky s-l-f-n -> some-long-function-name expansion? I've googled a bit but I can't seem to find it. Nice. I’m quite new to lisp, and these videos are a great way to see what’s possible.

I’ve always hated the “*-unit” style of defining tests, though :-) It just seems too verbose without giving a “natural language” feel to the code. RSpec (the Ruby extension) looks much nicer and should be easy to port to lisp (if it hasn’t already) - http://rspec.rubyforge.org/

Anyway, I also have a question: what emacs command/library do you use to do that funky s-l-f-n -> some-long-function-name expansion? I’ve googled a bit but I can’t seem to find it.

]]> By: harsha http://www.lispcast.com/wordpress/2007/10/lispcast-episode-3/#comment-472 harsha Mon, 29 Oct 2007 21:39:34 +0000 http://www.lispcast.com/wordpress/2007/10/lispcast-episode-3/#comment-472 great work! nice video tutorials on lisp web app developement. looking forward to the next episode great work! nice video tutorials on lisp web app developement. looking forward to the next episode

]]> By: filippos http://www.lispcast.com/wordpress/2007/10/lispcast-episode-3/#comment-471 filippos Mon, 29 Oct 2007 19:24:17 +0000 http://www.lispcast.com/wordpress/2007/10/lispcast-episode-3/#comment-471 Excellent work. Looking forward to the next episode. Excellent work. Looking forward to the next episode.

]]> By: okflo http://www.lispcast.com/wordpress/2007/10/lispcast-episode-3/#comment-470 okflo Mon, 29 Oct 2007 18:27:37 +0000 http://www.lispcast.com/wordpress/2007/10/lispcast-episode-3/#comment-470 great! please continue. - okflo great! please continue. - okflo

]]>