Comments on: Time window matcher

By: LOOP Macro Love | LispCast

LOOP Macro Love | LispCast — Mon, 05 Nov 2007 05:26:03 +0000

[…] I’ve re-written my time-window code. It’s cleaner, it compiles the matchers to nested lambdas (so it’s faster), and now it […]

By: Anton

Anton — Sun, 04 Nov 2007 14:23:00 +0000

> So, right now, I’m looking for a challenge to post to
> the comp.lang.ruby newsgroup. I want one that will
> rattle them to the bone about the inadequacy of
> their language. Nothing big, just a whopper to get
> them thinking. Do you have any ideas? Let’s give
> them something to talk about.

As a last resort we may just write to comp.lang.ruby that they are idiots.

By: admin

admin — Fri, 26 Oct 2007 18:02:27 +0000

You’re right, they’re the same. This tells me I need to read the docs a little better.

Thanks!

By: Zach Beane

Zach Beane — Fri, 26 Oct 2007 11:10:00 +0000

Are you aware of CL-PPCRE:REGISTER-GROUPS-BIND? How does it differ from your SCAN-AND-BIND?

By: admin

admin — Thu, 25 Oct 2007 23:24:34 +0000

Well, now that I think about it, I could do a better parser with a regular-expression-cond form. . .
What an idea!